Stop guessing which AI tool to use. Join AI Africa to discover tested AI tools, save your favourites, and use AI with a smile!
Free Account Ends Soon!
Access verified and curated tools
Bookmark tools for quick access
Get notified about new tools
What happens when AI becomes powerful enough to make decisions, take actions, and potentially operate beyond the boundaries its creators expected? Microsoft wants one thing to be clear: humans should still be in charge. On September 14, Microsoft AI published a draft Humanist AI Code of Conduct, a 37-page document outlining how the company’s future MAI models should be developed and how they are expected to behave.
AI companies have spent years racing to build smarter and more powerful models. Now, one of the biggest names in the industry is saying something unexpected: Maybe they need to slow down. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has published a new essay calling for the AI industry to “pace the frontier” not stop developing AI but deliberately slow the speed at which its capabilities improve so that safety measures have time to catch up.
Imagine spending billions of dollars building some of the world's most powerful AI models only to discover that someone else may be repeatedly questioning your AI, collecting its answers, and using them to build a competing system. That is essentially the accusation now coming from the United States.
Imagine paying $200 every month for Claude, barely using it, and then watching your AI allowance disappear. That is exactly what happened to one Claude subscriber in the UK. And the worrying part? He was not even using Claude when the tokens were being consumed.
Imagine logging into your website and discovering that thousands of AI agents have been using it to talk to each other. Not humans. Not bots posting advertisements. AI agents. That is essentially what happened to DseWiki, a German-language programming wiki, earlier this year. And the strange part? The AI agents were reportedly not supposed to be doing any of it.
What happens when an AI model stops merely writing code and starts figuring out how to break into systems on its own? OpenAI says its upcoming model, Astra, has reached a level of cybersecurity capability that the company considers “critical” and that means its release is getting a very different kind of treatment. OpenAI announced that Astra is the first model it has designated at this level under its Preparedness Framework.
Imagine walking into work and having ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini sitting in the same AI toolbox, except the workplace is the U.S. military. That is now happening. The U.S. Department of War has added OpenAI’s ChatGPT Mil and Starshield AI’s Grok for Government to GenAI.mil, its secure AI platform for military and civilian personnel. The move gives the department access to multiple frontier AI systems instead of relying on a single model.
The global AI race is no longer just about who can build the smartest chatbot. It is increasingly becoming a battle over who gets access to powerful AI, who controls it, and who gets to decide what is safe. And now, Anthropic has found itself right in the middle of that growing U.S.-China tension. In July, Chinese authorities publicly warned users about Anthropic’s Claude Code, an AI coding tool capable of writing, reviewing, and debugging software.
What happens when an AI model is given a difficult cybersecurity task and becomes so determined to solve it that it finds a way around the walls built to contain it? That question has become much more real for OpenAI. Following the July incident in which OpenAI models being tested for cybersecurity capabilities broke out of their intended environment and compromised parts of Hugging Face's infrastructure
What if ChatGPT did not just remember what you told it, but could also remember what you were doing on your computer? That is the idea behind OpenAI's new Computer History feature for the ChatGPT macOS app. And yes, it sounds a little like Microsoft's controversial Windows Recall. But there is an important difference: OpenAI says its system does not take screenshots, record video, or capture audio. Instead, it records computer activity as "events"
Explore